WORK
What has been completed?
Separate drafted, approved, published, and verified work.
Reporting example
Know what changed.
Know what still needs work.
A useful progress review connects completed work to observed changes and the next decision.
An example of the reporting structure.
Illustrative reporting format only. This example contains no client data, campaign results, or performance forecast.
| Area | Baseline records | Each review records | What it helps you decide |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search visibility | Agreed query, URL, date, location, and observed position | Comparable position and changes in sources | Whether exposure has changed on the agreed searches |
| Professional content | Existing assets and identified gaps | Drafted, approved, published, and indexed states | Which work is complete and what needs approval |
| Privacy exposure | Covered sources with matching listings | Found, requested, confirmed, or reappeared | Which listings still require follow-up |
| Reviews & listings | Locations, profile accuracy, and response coverage | Verified updates, response activity, and trends | Where local teams need attention |
Every review should answer three questions.
CHANGE
What is different from baseline?
Compare the agreed searches, sources, and exposure measures.
NEXT
What happens next?
Identify remaining concerns, dependencies, approvals, and priorities.
Privacy reporting from our partner.
DeleteMe publishes its own sample report. It illustrates the provider’s reporting format and is separate from Reputation Repair’s reporting framework.
View DeleteMe’s sample reportYour situation deserves a specific plan.
Tell us what people find online and what you want to change.